Can Mechanisms Really Replace Laws of Nature?*
نویسندگان
چکیده
Today, mechanisms and mechanistic explanation are very popular in philosophy of science and are deemed a welcome alternative to laws of nature and deductive-nomological explanation. Starting from Mitchell’s pragmatic notion of laws, I cast doubt on their status as a genuine alternative. I argue that (1) all complex-systems mechanisms ontologically must rely on stable regularities, while (2) the reverse need not hold. Analogously, (3) models of mechanisms must incorporate pragmatic laws, while (4) such laws themselves need not always refer to underlying mechanisms. Finally, I show that Mitchell’s account is more encompassing than the mechanistic account
منابع مشابه
Mechanisms and Laws: Clarifying the Debate
Leuridan (2011) questions whether mechanisms can really replace laws at the heart of our thinking about science. In doing so, he enters a long-standing discussion about the relationship between the mechanistic structures evident in the theories of contemporary biology and the laws of nature privileged especially in traditional empiricist traditions of the philosophy of science (see e.g. Wimsatt...
متن کاملMechanical explanation of nature and its limits in Kant's Critique of judgment.
In this paper I discuss two questions. What does Kant understand by mechanical explanation in the Critique of judgment? And why does he think that mechanical explanation is the only type of the explanation of nature available to us? According to the interpretation proposed, mechanical explanations in the Critique of judgment refer to a particular species of empirical causal laws. Mechanical law...
متن کاملThree Merry Roads to T-violation
This paper is a tour of how the laws of nature can distinguish between the past and the future, or be T -violating. I argue that, in terms of basic analytic arguments, there are really just three approaches currently being explored. I show how each is characterized by a symmetry principle, which provides a template for detecting T -violating laws even without knowing the laws of physics themsel...
متن کاملAre Miracles Violations of the Laws of Nature?
Classical theism holds that God rules the world not only indirectly, by the natural laws established with creation, but through actions or direct interventions that interfere with natural processes and human actions. These direct interventions are usually called miracles. Modern Western philosophy, at least starting from Spinoza and Hume, has defined miracles as “violations of the laws of natur...
متن کاملThe Preference of Models over Laws of Nature in Chemistry
Although the notion of God as the legislator of nature was already known in the JewishChristian tradition, the modern concept of laws of nature was established only in 17th-century mechanical philosophy of nature, particularly by Descartes and Newton, and remained largely confined to that tradition before it became seriously questioned in quantum mechanics. After a brief historical survey I fir...
متن کامل